Order Now

Auditor’s Report on Performance Evaluation Standards.

Auditor’s Report on Performance Evaluation Standards.

Assume that an internal compliance auditor issued a report to your organization. In this report, the auditor noted irregularities in how performance appraisals ratings were administered. As a result, compensation increases were calculated inconsistently. As the HR Manager you must provide a response to the compliance auditor.

In at least 3 full pages, draft an email addressing the following topics in order using the prescribed section headers in bold.

Section 1 – Evaluating Performance with Absolute Standards- In this section, describe (1) the purpose and value of absolute standards to measure performance, and (2) the advantages and disadvantages of this method.

Section 2- Evaluating Performance with Relative Standards. In this section, describe (1) the purpose and value of relative standards to measure performance, and (2) the advantages and disadvantages of this method.

Section 3- My Recommended Evaluation Standards. In this section, (1) select and defend your recommended performance evaluation standards for your organization given your findings in the previous sections, and (2) explain how these findings foster strategic value to your organization.

Section 4-Effective Performance Appraisals- In this section, suggest ways the organization can increase the effectiveness of performance appraisals regardless of your recommended standards.

Section 5- References. In this section, provide the full citations for 2 credible sources according to the CSU Global Writing Center (Links to an external site.). You also incorporated these 2 references internally appropriately.

Additional requirements:

This assignment is not a traditional APA-styled paper. Therefore, an introduction and conclusion are not required for this assignment.

Use one-inch margins, size 12 font, double-spaced line spacing, and page numbers.

A minimum of two scholarly/peer-reviewed references must be included. Do not use blogs, Wikis, or anonymous sources.


As you start working on your critical thinking assignments  I want you to not simply summarize and regurgitating case material. This is fine for your overview but you have to get deeper into the analysis and the assessment at this level of academia. Remember the Words Of Wisdom (WOW) in that:

  1. Create the framework for your position and make a pertinent point to support your overall position. Remember, your overall position should be established in your introductory phase.
  2. Provide a citation or some other form of academic evidence to validate your point as academically relevant.
  3. Provide your theoretical analysis to further analyze and assess along with supporting the point. Please keep in mind that your theoretical analysis is merely your insight based on academic evidence, your experience, and course materials.
  4. Provide an example, whenever possible, to show clarification and application of the point so as to further support this point and the overall position you take.

As you undertake this process always work to get to the how and the why of each point and your overall position. Another key point that may help you is to provide a powerful lead and compelling reason for the reader to take a keen interest in your position.

This announcement is closed for comments


Auditor’s Report on Performance Evaluation Standards.




Order Now

Calculate Your Order Price

Price (USD)